Subject: Re: Mesa3d
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ron Roskens <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/17/2003 18:03:43
* Jan Schaumann <email@example.com> [2003-11-17 15:19:09 -0500]:
> Jan Schaumann <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Jan Schaumann <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > I'm working on this. One of the things that held me back from updating
> > > those packages is that oddly enough graphics/glut now creates
> > > libglut.so.0.0. The previous was .so.10.1, so I really don't quite
> > > understand why that would be the case.
> Attached are patches to update Mesa* and gl*. glut still builds
> libglut.so.0.0, but I see no way short of renaming/forcing it to get
> another version number.
> Forcing it may, however, not be a good idea since we then digress from
> the original distribution. So... any objections if we just use
I think your missing a patch in there... After applying your patch, building
in MesaLib errors out in post-patch because INCLUDES and DEFS are not defined
before using +=.
As for the version being 0.0, the version-info is not being given to libtool.
Look in src-glut/Makefile.am and you will find there is a commented line out
which adds the -version-info @LIBGLUT_VERSION_INFO@ to libglut_la_LDFLAGS.