Subject: Re: The PKGREVISION bump after openssl bump
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 11/17/2003 15:33:11
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:22:39AM -0500, Todd Vierling wrote:
> This policy about bumping PKGREVISION recursively on *any* version change is
> starting to get on my nerves, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Bumping
> dependencies' PKGREVISIONs should only happen if there is a binary
> incompatible change of some kind.
Or if there are security problems, which was the point of this bump.