Subject: Re: plugins.mk (doh!)
To: Jeremy C. Reed <email@example.com>
From: Juan RP <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/09/2003 06:09:07
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 20:54:17 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <email@example.com> wrote:
> (Or how will binary packages be provided?)
We will use a default browser for every package IMHO, in this case
mozilla will be used (moz-flash).
> But should work with any browser that uses same netscape-style plugins
> (like navigator, konqueror, and opera) and built for same operating system
> and architecture too.
True, but opera already have a specific package (www/opera-plugins). I was
missing the Netscape browser (who in the earth uses this actually ? :)
The last problem is konqueror, but I think it's not important, because konqueror
has the option to specify the plugins directory on the preferences menu :-)
> I think it would be better if was installed to one location and then use
> symlinks for each browser. So you don't have to install multiple times for
> each browser.
True, I will try to make some modifications ...
Juan Romero Pardines <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Noticias BSD en castellano: http://www.UnixBSD.org/
El Proyecto NetBSD: http://www.NetBSD.org/