Subject: Re: USE_TETEX2 (was: CVS commit: pkgsrc)
To: Jeremy C. Reed <email@example.com>
From: Dan McMahill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/07/2003 18:26:09
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 08:35:23AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> To pkgsrc-changes on Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > pkgsrc/mk: bsd.pkg.defaults.mk
> > pkgsrc/print/dvipdfm: Makefile
> > Log Message:
> > add USE_TETEX2 configuration variable and modify dvipdfm to use this
> > to allow it to work with teTeX2 or teTeX instead of requiring only
> > teTeX (1).
> I see this could be useful, but it seems like it would be better if
> everything would default to tetex version 2 already. There has been some
> discussion about making tetex version 2 the default and even changing
> print/teTeX2-bin to be named print/teTeX-bin.
> (So maybe this should be called USE_TETEX1 instead of 2.)
> > To generate a diff of this commit:
> > cvs rdiff -r1.189 -r1.190 pkgsrc/mk/bsd.pkg.defaults.mk
> > cvs rdiff -r1.8 -r1.9 pkgsrc/print/dvipdfm/Makefile
> Was there a PR for these changes during the freeze? (Or was something
There was not a PR because I figured filing one, making the change, then
marking as closed was a bit silly. And things did appear to be broken.
Unfortunately it appears now that it was my checking out the PLIST for
teTeX2-bin that was broken....