On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 05:19:54 -0400
Dan McMahill <dmcmahill@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 13:19:04 +0200 (MEST)
> Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de> wrote:
> 
> > graphics/transcode:     build broken	1    	(jmmv,
> > tech-pkg@NetBSD.org)
> 
> This is because two conflicting packages are in the flattened
> dependencies for this package.  Both nasm and nasm-devel are depended
> upon and they conflict with each other.

Why do we keep two different versions of nasm?  I have hit the problem you describe
lots of times when building packages without the bulk build infrastructure.
Couldn't we simply have nasm, updated to nasm-devel's version?  I only have the
later installed and haven't seen problems so far.  And it is more complete (all
rdf utilities, info documentation, html manual...)

Cheers

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv@menta.net>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/