Subject: Re: lightweight groff package?
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/21/2003 08:00:51
There's a judgment call to be made on a per-package basis:
And my pet peeve: dependencies on libraries that have major version
bumps way too often. If a library is fairly stable, 'make replace' of
it will succeed and seem like a sane thing to do when it has an
upgrade. Upgrades for libiconv (recently) and gettext (earlier) were
substantially more troublesome, although for the most part 'make
update' just worked.
Greg Troxel <email@example.com>