Subject: Re: java category (was: video vs. multimedia)
To: None <tech-pkg@NetBSD.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netbsd.org>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 08/14/2003 10:15:58
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org> wrote:

> don't forget we can also have pseudo-categories, which aren't
> directories in pkgsrc but can be defined in CATEGORIES.

I've come to the conclusion that a pseudo-category might be more
suitable for 'java' than an actual package.  That way, we could make it
easy for people to look for binary packages, but still keep the
respective main categories.

Any objections if I add a 'java' category to the packages I mentioned in
my other mail?

-Jan

--=20
I'm not even supposed to be here today!

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/O5mdfFtkr68iakwRArRqAKC7HBccCXxOR2Pb1KRFnnDVipal/ACcCvyT
1BfZ82NjTgjHVSjJdgFkRaM=
=HIQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--