Subject: Re: circular dependency for gcc with USE_GCC
To: Gavan Fantom <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: grant beattie <grant@NetBSD.org>
Date: 08/12/2003 00:22:20
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Gavan Fantom wrote:
> > Ouch that's a even nastier manifestation of the some problem I suppose.
> > I dare to say that the culprit is tools.mk ;)
> tools.mk suffers the same problem, but the culprit here is
> I'm thinking through a more generic solution, but for now I think this is
> the right answer.
I haven't had a chance to test the patch and debug this further,
but it seems to be the right way - we shouldn't allow a dependency loop
to occur at all. this should have been tested more, mea culpa.
thanks for looking at it.