Subject: Re: Consistent "Optional Dependecy" handling
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jeremy C. Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/31/2003 16:03:57
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> And you are screwed up with binary packages. This is all wonderful when
> using pkgsrc directly, but how do you tell if foobar-1.0.tgz in the ftp
> include gtk support or not? And, if it included gtk by default, what
> happens if you don't need it and don't want to rebuilt the package?
> etcetera... (though in some cases they are really necessary...)
We already do offer that feature (and yes, it could be a problem).
The OpenBSD "FLAVOR" like solution would be for the name of the package to
change too (i.e. add "-gtk" to the filename and maybe also package name).
And in another message on Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Nate Hill wrote:
> Okay, so after learning some more about pkgsrc, I have a slight and
> rough proposal:
> Standardize the USE* variables in bsd.pkg.defaults.mk:
> USE_FOO <- generic YES|NO flag for feature FOO
> USE_FOO_FOO2 <- use feature FOO2 for package FOO (specific quirks)
I think that the standard is to use the PACKAGE_USE_FOO (package name
> Allow package Makefiles to use conditional statements based on USE
Many packages already do this :)
> Being able to set USE_GTK = NO in mk.conf would be extremely useful...
Need to find a developer who has the time to do this. Hopefully, you can
provide some patches.
Jeremy C. Reed