Subject: Re: libIDL broken?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: adam morley <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/11/2003 09:05:34
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:31:21PM +0200, Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> > while doing bmake in meta-pkg/gnome2. note that this is while
> > compiling libIDL (one of the dependancies.) It looks to me like -lIDL
> > is missing. I didn't see it listed as a bug here:
> see "./.libs/libIDL-2.so" above. the error itself says that the symbols
> are first referenced _in_ libIDL-2.so.
Oh duh, I'm dumb.
> > http://www.netbsd.org/Gnats/category/pkg.html, so I thought I might be
> > missing something obvious. I unloopback mounted the current pkgsrc
> > tree I'm using and checked one out with CVS (which reminds me, I
> > didn't see a good explanation of how to do that in the pkgsrc docs,
> > but I found one in the list archives), and the same problem with
> > libIDL continued.
> > So am I doing something totally wrong here or is this really a bug I
> > should file?
> i just tried to build it on Solaris 9 and had no problems. i am using
> the native compiler, though.
Native compiler = Sun's compiler? Or pkgsrc's gcc? Because I'm using the gcc from ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/grant/pkgsrc/SunOS/5.9/sparc/ , added with pkg_add.
I'm currently recompiling gcc from the cvs checkout, but I'm not so sure that's going to solve it. My path is this: