Subject: libIDL broken?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: adam morley <email@example.com>
Date: 07/10/2003 13:51:56
So I've been postponing my work on pkgsrc on solaris 8 while futsing with it on Solaris 9. Using the binary kit, its going along very nicely things are working just peachy. Then I ran into:
gcc -O -I/usr/pkgsrc/net/libIDL/work/.buildlink/include -Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib -o .libs/tstidl tstidl.o -Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib -Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib -Wl,-R/usr/pkg/lib -L/usr/pkgsrc/net/libIDL/work/.buildlink/lib ./.libs/libIDL-2.so -L/usr/pkg/lib /usr/pkg/lib/libglib-2.0.so -liconv /usr/pkg/lib/libintl.so -lc /usr/pkg/lib/libiconv.so -R/usr/pkg/lib
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to .libs/tstidl
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
while doing bmake in meta-pkg/gnome2. note that this is while compiling libIDL (one of the dependancies.) It looks to me like -lIDL is missing. I didn't see it listed as a bug here: http://www.netbsd.org/Gnats/category/pkg.html, so I thought I might be missing something obvious. I unloopback mounted the current pkgsrc tree I'm using and checked one out with CVS (which reminds me, I didn't see a good explanation of how to do that in the pkgsrc docs, but I found one in the list archives), and the same problem with libIDL continued.
So am I doing something totally wrong here or is this really a bug I should file?