Subject: Re: SPECIAL_PERMS on files?
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
Date: 07/03/2003 10:59:55
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:52:42 +0200 (MEST)
Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Johnny Lam wrote:
> > > I understand that tar/pax cannot be trusted to preserve permissions of
> > > directories, but why is SPECIAL_PERMS used for files? As far as I
> > > understand, tar/pax handles them fine. What's the idea here?
> > It's primarily for when the file needs to be set to a certain user or
> > group that may be created by the package. I'd gotten into the habit of
> > also noting setuid programs installed by the package just for the sake
> > of documentation.
> Um, so it's mostly duplicate work from what a "make install" does, no real
If you use SPECIAL_PERMS then you shouldn't need to set them in the install
stage, as I understand it. Also, it is useful to set permissions of files
that are copied outside LOCALBASE (i.e., in sysconfdir or in /var), isn't it?
Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/