Subject: Re: make replace
To: Micha? Pasternak <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Maxwell <email@example.com>
Date: 06/14/2003 09:26:43
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:57:55AM +0200, Micha? Pasternak wrote:
> Masao Uebayashi [Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:36:44PM +0900]:
> > > It warned me about data loss but it gave me no chance to bail-out before
> > > it started to work.
> > So, you learnt that you should do things more carefully? ;)
> Yes. Also I suggest displaying this warning a little bit earlier to
> give the user a chance to break.
How did you find out that there was a 'replace' target to make? That
source should have been the indication that 'make replace' is
experimental (note on the experiment: Works well for me :-).
I don't think adding a delay, or prompting, would be appropriate, but
perhaps requiring a PKG_EXPERIMENTAL=YES in mk.conf and making
experimental targets require that...
David Maxwell, firstname.lastname@example.orgemail@example.com --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville