Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 & '/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_eh'
To: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
From: grant beattie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/13/2003 06:36:26
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 11:25:40PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> It seems strange to include mk/gcc.buildlink2.mk in a package
> that doesn't actually require gcc, just special handling in
> the case of gcc3. Maybe it should be
> .if defined(USE_GCC3)
> . include "../../mk/gcc.buildlink2.mk"
I see you've done this for some packages. It seems reasonable to me.