Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/graphics/plotutils
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
Date: 06/06/2003 11:19:12
"Jeremy C. Reed" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >From email@example.com on Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > If X11 is present, set the pkgname to plotutils-x11 and conflict with
> > plain plotutils (and the other way around). ok'd by agc.
> And I see a change from a couple days ago: "if X11 is present, we need the
> necessary compile and ld flags".
> I didn't think we did that.
> What if I want plain plotutils?
If you have X installed, why not use it in this application as well?
It is possible to make make a package of this that doesn't use X even if
X is presentr: we'd need to pass "--without-x" as a configure argument.
> Why not two different pkgsrc like graphics/plotutils and
> graphics/plotutils-nox11 (or plotutils and plotutils-x11)?
Sure, we could do that. I thought this would work ok, since this way
you have essentially two packages, but if two completely separate
packages are preferred...
Except most of the good bits were about frogs, I remember that.
You would not believe some of the things about frogs.