Subject: Re: [PATCH] Again: GNOME 1 and 2 *can* coexist
To: Eric Gillespie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
Date: 06/02/2003 15:09:44
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:17:18 -0500
Eric Gillespie <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Julio Merino <email@example.com> writes:
Hmmm... that message ought to be private. Not that I care much, but you
should avoid replying private mails to public lists; some people can get
> > BTW, gnome1 and gnome2 libraries can coexist perfectly, but the same is not
> > applicable to binary programs, where several of them have the same executable
> > name. Right?
> I'm not sure. But we need to be able to have gnome-core
> installed along-side gnome-session and gnome-pane 2.x so that
> gnucash (which depends on gnome-core) can be installed along-side
> them. That is how i originally encountered the issue.
Yes. But what does gnucash need from gnome-core? IMHO, that part should
be splitted of gnome-core into a more fine-grained package so that gnucash
could depend on it rather on gnome-core. I feel that gnome-core should
just be a meta package depending on many other gnome-* parts (all of them
coming from the gnome-core distfile, but splitted by us). This has already
been done for gnome1-panel and gnome1-session, for example.
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/