Subject: Re: gcc/buildlink2.mk rejects lang/gcc3
To: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
From: grant beattie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/02/2003 20:04:07
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:19:42AM +0100, David wrote:
> A package that includes gcc/buildlink2.mk (for example
> audio/libogg) will attempt to install and use lang/gcc (2.95)
> even when lang/gcc3 (3.3) is installed.
> I'm assumign this is not quite right? :)
right, those packages should be changed to include
mk/gcc.buildlink2.mk instead (I had been meaning to do this but as yet
the time escaped me).