Subject: Re: -ffast-math and packages
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: David Brownlee <email@example.com>
Date: 05/28/2003 19:12:03
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > while i tend to agree i am not sure this is the way pkgsrc should go.
> > this time it's -ffast-math, next time it will be -finline-functions or
> > something else.
> You've got a point. Are committers going to be obligated to check if
> every new package works with -ffast-math?
I would expect not - that would be down to anyone who wants to
use -ffast-math, and cares enough to update the appropriate
package makefiles with
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --