Subject: Re: pth-2.0.0 update
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thomas Klausner <email@example.com>
Date: 05/02/2003 17:10:54
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:50:54AM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2003, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> : Nick Hudson <skrll@netbsd> recently updated pth to 2.0.0
> : but ran out of time, so I finished the PKGREVISION bump work
> : that was made necessary because of the pth library major bump.
> Um, that's just wrong--since you did not update the dewey DEPENDS on pth,
> you should not have bumped PKGREVISION on dependent packages. Basically,
> you've just marked perfectly legit packages as out of date for no reason,
> since the old pth is still considered valid by pthread.buildlink2.mk.
Thanks, I overlooked that. It's fixed now.