Subject: Re: elm and metamail
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jan Schaumann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/04/2003 12:32:11
Jaromir Dolecek <email@example.com> wrote:
> What about patching elm to name the program differently?
Yes, that's one option. I'd have to see which is easier to patch,
metamail or elm. I don't use either myself, so I don't know in what
weird places it might call 'mmencode'.
> Another option would be to make elm depend on metamail unconditionaly.
In which case it would need to be patched to not install mmencode
I'll look more into both packages today, any other suggestions welcome.
I always said there was something fundamentally wrong with the universe.