Subject: Re: libcrypto vs. libcrypt
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christoph Badura <email@example.com>
Date: 03/13/2003 23:07:55
firstname.lastname@example.org (Jason R Thorpe) wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:17:50AM +0900, email@example.com wrote:
> > >Could someone take this on and fix it? Please?
> > no objection here (glad you mentioned), but it will need a shlib major
> > bump...
>hm... I don't think it will actually require a shlib version bump, because
>the function will continue to be provided because of the DT_NEEDED, right?
Except for static (.a) libs, of course.