Subject: Re: kdebase-3.1 vs. fontconfig ?
To: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mark Davies <email@example.com>
Date: 03/13/2003 17:47:26
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:31:07 -0800 (PST)
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Davies wrote:
> > Looks like configure is defining HAVE_FONTCONFIG for you when it doesn't for
> > me. Now why would that be?
> Found it: missing fonts/fontconfig/buildlink2.mk .include.
> (Now someone will have to fix that to deal properly with XF4.3...)
So presumably the presence of fontconfig-config on the PATH is enough for
configure to define HAVE_FONTCONFIG otherwise the absence of the headers from
the buildlink tree wouldn't matter as it wouldn't be trying to use them.