From:  Hubert Feyrer <hubertf@netbsd.org>
	Date:  Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:31:07 -0800 (PST)

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Davies wrote:
> > Looks like configure is defining HAVE_FONTCONFIG for you when it doesn't for
> > me.  Now why would that be?

> Found it: missing fonts/fontconfig/buildlink2.mk .include.
> (Now someone will have to fix that to deal properly with XF4.3...)

So presumably the presence of fontconfig-config on the PATH is enough for 
configure to define HAVE_FONTCONFIG otherwise the absence of the headers from 
the buildlink tree wouldn't matter as it wouldn't be trying to use them.

cheers
mark