> So if we need "-Wl,-rpath,/path", we patch the file to use "-Wl,-R/path"
> and then let buildlink2 convert it?  That is confusing, or at least
> counterintuitive.

I personally think this is fine.

What counterintuitive is not specific to _OPSYS_RPATH_NAME but all
Buildlink wrappers, isn't it?

Masao