Subject: Re: buildlink vs. real gcc ?!
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/04/2003 16:59:19
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:55:30PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Hum, that sounds broken to me. Can we move that into something that's not
> related to ncurses, like pkgsrc/mk/curses.mk (like we have emacs.mk,
> java-vm.mk, ...)? If I included the ncurses buildlink2.mk file, I expect
> to get ncurses used unconditionally.
Feel free to do this change.
> I think the INCOMPAT_CURSES shouldn't act on kernel version, but on shared
> lib version or so. I use a -current kernel with a -stable userland...
That's just not something we support for now... at least I can't think
of any other place where we do.