Subject: Re: updating teTeX package to 2.0.1
To: Julio Merino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
Date: 02/22/2003 11:35:31
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:30:32AM +0100, Julio Merino wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:17:05 +0100 Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> > btw. i would prefer having TETEX_NO_X11 option and correct the
> > packages accordingly. i am using it on few machines without X for
> > generating some documents and i had to manually hack the packages.
> > i can take care of this later myself if you would prefer that.
> > i don't think it's necessary to create -nox11 version of teTeX
> > packages
> it is. for the same reason always mentioned. A single package produces
> one binary (yes... there are a few exceptions, but the less we have,
> the better).
i understand but the point was that i expect almost nobody wanting
X-less TeX (at least i am not aware that anybody ever requested such
functionality) so i am not sure it's worth all that work making all
additional packages using either teTeX or teTeX-nox11. at least i won't
do it, i'd rather keep a small local patch this way.
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> --
-- <email@example.com> --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----