Subject: Re: updating teTeX package to 2.0.1
To: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
From: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
Date: 02/22/2003 11:30:32
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:17:05 +0100
Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 10:26:55AM +0900, SUNAGAWA Keiki wrote:
> > Any comments?
> btw. i would prefer having TETEX_NO_X11 option and correct the packages
> accordingly. i am using it on few machines without X for generating
> some documents and i had to manually hack the packages. i can take care
> of this later myself if you would prefer that.
> i don't think it's necessary to create -nox11 version of teTeX packages
it is. for the same reason always mentioned. A single package produces one
binary (yes... there are a few exceptions, but the less we have, the better).
> since probably only very small minority of users will want to do use it
Hmm... this minority may grow if the packages are there ;)
Julio M. Merino Vidal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The NetBSD Project - http://www.NetBSD.org/