Subject: Re: cvs diff vs diff(1)
To: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
From: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
Date: 01/25/2003 13:11:15
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 12:19:55PM +0100, Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> i meant it breaks the policy which says that we should have patches in
> "diff -bu" format. sorry if it was uncertain.
Can someone explain why a "cvs diff" vs. a "diff" would be a problem here?
I guess the policy author(s) just wanted to stress the "-bu" part here,
and a "cvs diff -bu" is ok too.