Subject: Re: file-roller missing dependencies
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Eric Gillespie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/11/2003 10:36:59
Julio Merino <email@example.com> writes:
> Does the file-roller binary change, depending on which archivers
> were present at compile time? If that is not the case, we could
> simply recommend the administrator through a MESSAGE to install as
> many compression tools as he wants. (and probably depend on the most
> common ones, i.e, gzip, bzip2, zip).
Ah, should have thought of that. The binary does not change; it
doesn't even try to detect any of the archivers at build-time. I
would say that no dependencies are necessary by default, since in
that case it can still create tar archives compresses with gzip
or bzip2. That is a reasonable default. The note in MESSAGE
ought to take care of the rest.
A more serious problem is pkg/19788.
Eric Gillespie <*> firstname.lastname@example.org
Build a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on
fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. -Terry Pratchett