Subject: Re: Changing order of update process
To: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
From: Thomas Klausner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/25/2002 17:34:52
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 10:26:15AM -0600, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> What's more, if a package is broken in that
> way, anything you to with "make update" doesn't fix it -- plain "make"
> with the old package installed is still going to break, and people are
> still going to complain about that.
It's not going to work recursively, but it works for a single package.
That's a slight improvement, but quite good sometimes,
e.g. if the single package is openoffice.
Thomas Klausner - email@example.com
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find
out, which is the exact opposite. -- Bertrand Russell