Subject: Re: alternate pkg tree
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Julio Merino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/09/2002 12:28:55
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:47:40 +0100
Urban Boquist <email@example.com> wrote:
> The easiest is probably to build binary packages, as someone else
> mentioned. I.e., just use "make package" instead of "make
> install". After that your "recipe" for switching over to the new
> packages would be something like:
Yes, this is the easiest way probably. Though, using mksandbox you will
have to do several stages by hand, isn't it? (I do not know enough about
it)... consider trying pkg_comp ;) You can tell to it which packages you
want to build and generate tgz's and all will be automated hehe.
> James> Should Packages.txt be updated to mention this script?
As I have seen, it already tells you how to setup a sandbox but it does
not mention mksandbox, which will automate the process.
Julio Merino (http://jmmv.dyndns.org/) <firstname.lastname@example.org>