On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Alistair Crooks wrote:

> > Does this seem a bit klunky to anybody else? You shouldn't have to insert a
> > garbage line just to convince download-vulnerability-list that the new file is
> > OK to replace the old one...
>
> If you can think of a better way to determine if the file was damaged in
> transit, I'm all ears.

	wc -l?

-- 
		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --