Subject: Re: RFC: new variable SUGGESTS, Part II
To: Jan Schaumann <email@example.com>
From: Rene Hexel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/07/2002 06:57:15
On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 14:06, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> How would you do that? If you want to specify beforehand that you only
> want to accept certain packages, you'd have to know exactly which ones
> you want. I think I don't understand you correctly here -- if you want
Well, you could know that if, for example, you had compiled a set of
packages before. This was meant to be an additional option to
TAKE_SUGGESSTS=YES (or NO).
> > Take a look at gnome, for example.
> Well, are you able to say "install all of gnome, but do not install pan
> and ee"? With meta-pkgs you _are_ making an all-or-nothing decision.
This wasn't a comparison between meta-packages and TAKE_SUGGESTS.
What I meant was that if I automatically build a large number of
package, I might want to be able to specify which suggestions to include
and which not. For example, if I compiled gnome, I get a large number
of packages. Some of them might have SUGGESTS and of these, I might
know which ones to take and which ones not to take (because this already
is the 378th time I compiled these packages). That's where I believe it
would make sense to allow for an explicit list of SUGGESTS to be picked
up (as an option to TAKE_SUGGESTS=YES and NO).
> As I said, I may be misunderstanding you here - how would you implement
> this? As a regular expression? Category-based?
I was thinking of a list of regular expressions. This way, the
current SUGGESTS could easily be matched against this list to check
whether or not to include the current suggestion.