Subject: Re: pth & pth-syscall
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/12/2002 23:22:52
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:37:51AM -0500, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > | On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David Brownlee wrote:
> > |
> > | > Just curious- do we have any idea of a timescale for switching
> > | > pth across to pth-syscall (I'm assuming the plan is to merge
> > | > pth-syscall back into pth?).
> > | >
> > | > Just about everything pth using I've tried has worked fine with
> > | > pth-syscall. Personally I'd support cutting across now :)
> > |
> > | "xmms" had to be recompiled (otherwise it hung). The include changes,
> > | so it's technically an API change, and would require bumping the
> > | DEPENDS in buildlink.mk and other places. I believe it would end up
> > | being a fairly extensive churn.
> > Does it? I didn't recompile xmms (between a "pkg replace") and it
> > worked OK for me.
> It worked at first for me, too, but after a while, it hung up and
> grabbed my Xserver while I was resizing the window. I haven't had any
> problems since rebuilding it.
P.S.: I also edited out the CPPFLAGS line in xmms' "Makefile".