Subject: Re: pth & pth-syscall
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/12/2002 23:21:45
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:37:51AM -0500, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> | On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David Brownlee wrote:
> | > Just curious- do we have any idea of a timescale for switching
> | > pth across to pth-syscall (I'm assuming the plan is to merge
> | > pth-syscall back into pth?).
> | >
> | > Just about everything pth using I've tried has worked fine with
> | > pth-syscall. Personally I'd support cutting across now :)
> | "xmms" had to be recompiled (otherwise it hung). The include changes,
> | so it's technically an API change, and would require bumping the
> | DEPENDS in buildlink.mk and other places. I believe it would end up
> | being a fairly extensive churn.
> Does it? I didn't recompile xmms (between a "pkg replace") and it
> worked OK for me.
It worked at first for me, too, but after a while, it hung up and
grabbed my Xserver while I was resizing the window. I haven't had any
problems since rebuilding it.