Subject: Re: pth & pth-syscall
To: None <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/11/2002 17:38:47
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 email@example.com wrote:
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David Brownlee wrote:
> > > Just curious- do we have any idea of a timescale for switching
> > > pth across to pth-syscall (I'm assuming the plan is to merge
> > > pth-syscall back into pth?).
> Absolutley right.
> > > Just about everything pth using I've tried has worked fine with
> > > pth-syscall. Personally I'd support cutting across now :)
> "Just about"? Is there something that isn't?
I phrased that poorly. The only issue I've had with pth-syscall
has been at compile timw ith packages trying to install pth as
well. All applications have runw ithout problems.
> > "xmms" had to be recompiled (otherwise it hung). The include changes,
> > so it's technically an API change, and would require bumping the
> > DEPENDS in buildlink.mk and other places. I believe it would end up
> > being a fairly extensive churn.
> Right, I viewed the change to be "too much" during the current freeze.
Obviously the final call on this would be Al's, but given the
apparent lack of problems with pth-syscall I think we should
go ahead before the 1.6 pkgsrc tag - otherwise we end up creating
a nightmare for anyone trying to use kde3 with 1.6 tagged pkgsrc,
plus an extra upgrade pain when we do merge.
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --