Subject: Re: pth & pth-syscall
To: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 06/11/2002 13:38:39
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David Brownlee wrote:
> > Just curious- do we have any idea of a timescale for switching
> > pth across to pth-syscall (I'm assuming the plan is to merge
> > pth-syscall back into pth?).
> > Just about everything pth using I've tried has worked fine with
> > pth-syscall. Personally I'd support cutting across now :)
"Just about"? Is there something that isn't?
> "xmms" had to be recompiled (otherwise it hung). The include changes,
> so it's technically an API change, and would require bumping the
> DEPENDS in buildlink.mk and other places. I believe it would end up
> being a fairly extensive churn.
Right, I viewed the change to be "too much" during the current freeze.