Subject: Re: pth & pth-syscall
To: Frederick Bruckman <>
From: None <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/11/2002 13:38:39 wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, David Brownlee wrote:
> > 	Just curious- do we have any idea of a timescale for switching
> > 	pth across to pth-syscall (I'm assuming the plan is to merge
> > 	pth-syscall back into pth?).

Absolutley right.

> > 	Just about everything pth using I've tried has worked fine with
> > 	pth-syscall. Personally I'd support cutting across now :)

"Just about"? Is there something that isn't?

> "xmms" had to be recompiled (otherwise it hung). The include changes,
> so it's technically an API change, and would require bumping the
> DEPENDS in and other places. I believe it would end up
> being a fairly extensive churn.

Right, I viewed the change to be "too much" during the current freeze.