Subject: Re: pth or pth-syscall ???
To: Ciarcinski, Adam \(ISS Brussels\) <ACiarcinski@iss.net>
From: ptiJo <ptiJo@noos.fr>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 06/03/2002 12:44:03
On the last episode, "Ciarcinski, Adam (ISS Brussels)"
<ACiarcinski@iss.net> said to "'ptiJo'" <ptiJo@noos.fr>,
tech-pkg@netbsd.org:

> > 	So I guess those are the same ?
> > 	Then why having two differents (and conflicting) packages ?
> > 	Would a "USE_PTHREAD=native pth pth-syscall" in 
> > /etc/mk.conf solve
> > this ?
> 
> In my humble opinion, it's better to add
> 
> PTHREAD_TYPE=pth-syscall

 may I ask why ?
 I meen, according to their DESCR, pth-syscall "(...)makes use of the
--enable-syscall-hard(...)"
 is that the main thing that makes it "better" to use than pth ?

> 
> to /etc/mk.conf
> 
> 	kind regards
> 
> 		- Adam
> 

Cheers,
	Jo