Subject: Re: pth or pth-syscall ???
To: Ciarcinski, Adam \(ISS Brussels\) <ACiarcinski@iss.net>
From: ptiJo <ptiJo@noos.fr>
Date: 06/03/2002 12:44:03
On the last episode, "Ciarcinski, Adam (ISS Brussels)"
<ACiarcinski@iss.net> said to "'ptiJo'" <ptiJo@noos.fr>,
> > So I guess those are the same ?
> > Then why having two differents (and conflicting) packages ?
> > Would a "USE_PTHREAD=native pth pth-syscall" in
> > /etc/mk.conf solve
> > this ?
> In my humble opinion, it's better to add
may I ask why ?
I meen, according to their DESCR, pth-syscall "(...)makes use of the
is that the main thing that makes it "better" to use than pth ?
> to /etc/mk.conf
> kind regards
> - Adam