On Saturday 01 June 2002 4:02 pm, David Brownlee wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Nick Hudson wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 01 June 2002 5:27 am, Rene Hexel wrote:
> >
> > >   BTW, I've been running with pth-syscall (focibly injected in place of
> > > a pre-existing pth) for a couple of days, without any problems so far.
> > > I have about 50 packages installed that depend on pth (most of them
> > > gnome packages).  So it seems like the syscall-hard problems of earlier
> > > versions have been fixed ...
> >
> > If this is the case lets get rid of pth-syscall and have
> > --enable-syscall-hard in pth.
> 
> 	Very much so - right now we've split pkgsrc into two groups
> 	of mutually exclusive pth using packages.

Yep. It was always the idea to get to an --enable-syscall-hard pth. Its just 
the amount of testing to do this on my own was too much.

Nick