Subject: Re: both pth and pth-syscall?
To: Nick Hudson <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/01/2002 16:02:56
On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2002 5:27 am, Rene Hexel wrote:
> > BTW, I've been running with pth-syscall (focibly injected in place of
> > a pre-existing pth) for a couple of days, without any problems so far.
> > I have about 50 packages installed that depend on pth (most of them
> > gnome packages). So it seems like the syscall-hard problems of earlier
> > versions have been fixed ...
> If this is the case lets get rid of pth-syscall and have
> --enable-syscall-hard in pth.
Very much so - right now we've split pkgsrc into two groups
of mutually exclusive pth using packages.
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --