> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:56:06AM +0200, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > Au contraire - we cannot switch over to using pax whilst those
> > packages still use '@cwd' in their PLISTs. Even once we have
> > eradicated them, there are a huge number of binary packages out there
> > which need the @cwd functionality in there.

I haven't seen the original message (must have slipped by), but assuming
this was related to this afternoon's posting:

I was talking about the implementation of @cwd, not @cwd.


 - Hubert

-- 
Want to get a clue on IPv6 but don't know where to start? Try this:
* Basics -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/05/24/ipv6_tutorial.html
* Setup  -> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2001/06/01/ipv6_tutorial.html
Of course with your #1 IPv6 ready operating system -> http://www.NetBSD.org/