Subject: Re: Note about adding ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES is not treated as fault
To: Michal Pasternak <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Frederick Bruckman <email@example.com>
Date: 04/17/2002 08:02:58
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Michal Pasternak wrote:
> I am building lyx. It seems, that the fact, that xforms were not installed
> (and they were not built, because I didn't have corresponding entry in
> mk.conf) didn't cause an error while building (lyx build started - extract,
> patch, build, fault).
> Don't you think, that this should be corrected? I mean, shouldn't the note
> about ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES be treated as fault while building dependencies?
Possibly. Maybe all end-points for the IGNORE set case should end with
"false"? I think the point was not to stop a top-level "make build" with
no options, but no one does that, and bulk-builds wouldn't be affected.
By the way... I updated xforms to the brand new Open Source version last
night, and updated lyx et al. to work with it. That's probably available
via anoncvs by now.