Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/gcc
To: Masao Uebayashi <email@example.com>
From: James Chacon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/28/2002 05:42:30
Probably something different should be done. I'm open to opinions here
before I go through rototilling the places that refer to Makefile.gcc or
are checking egcs versions.
>> 2. Makefile.gcc can now be included by anything which depends on gcc versions.
>> If the version installed isn't 2.95.3 it'll add itself as a BUILD_DEPENDS.
>> (XXX: any of the makefile's in pkgsrc should be checked and change to use
>It would be nice that this file can be referred to as mk/gcc.mk, if
>there's a consensus that kludges to decide the right version of a
>package (or a some subsystem) across base systems and third party
>packages should be assembled under mk/, and the way mk/texinfo.mk is