Subject: Re: autoconf-devel vs autoconf-2.13
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Aaron J. Grier <email@example.com>
Date: 03/08/2002 11:58:27
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 08:04:00AM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Friday 08 March 2002 5:24 am, James Chacon wrote:
> > So...I need to patch configure.in in wm/icewm.
> > This requires autoconf 2.50 or greater which autoconf-devel
> > provides...Except that -devel conflicts with autoconf 2.13
> > Checking the Makefile I see only snmp and snns really care right now:
> > net/ucd-snmp/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS+= autoconf-2.13:../../devel/autoconf
> > math/snns/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS+= autoconf-2.13:../../devel/autoconf
> There are others that are not quite so obvious.
automake depends on autoconf. ;)
shouldn't these lines look more along the lines of
are there cases where 2.52 can't take the place of 2.13?
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | firstname.lastname@example.org
"[...] I generally haven't found IDM guys to be very good
live acts, most of them just sit down at their laptop and
tweak reaktor." -- Brandon Daniel