Subject: Re: autoconf-devel vs autoconf-2.13
To: Nick Hudson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: James Chacon <email@example.com>
Date: 03/08/2002 03:41:21
>On Friday 08 March 2002 8:30 am, James Chacon wrote:
>> >Patch both configure.in, configure and any other files that might be
>> >regenerated from the configure.in patch.
>> And just don't put a BUILD_DEPENDS line in?
>No. Its not needed.
Well sure if I patch configure it's not. But I thought the standard was
to patch configure.in and then rerun autoconf? i.e. the example for
BUILD_DEPENDS in Packages.txt specifically uses autoconf as it's example.
i.e. what should be done under "normal" circumstances?