Subject: Re: Problem with the bulidlink.mk files in aalib and aalib-x11
To: Bernd Ernesti <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Johnny C. Lam <email@example.com>
Date: 03/04/2002 12:43:54
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:53:25PM +0100, Bernd Ernesti wrote:
> I currently have a aalib-x11 installed on my system, because mplayer
> wants it.
> Now I am trying to install gphoto2, which now wants aalib.
> And here is the problem, both aalib and aalib-x11 have a CONFLICTS
> line for the other package.
> Normaly that wouldn't be a problem if thats a DEPENDS line in the
> gphoto2 package, but it is an buildlink.mk include and there seems
> to be no good way to fix this problem.
Do you know if aalib-x11 is a "superset" of aalib? By this, I'm asking
if something wants just aalib, will aalib-x11 also suffice? If so, then
we can combine their buildlink.mk files and rewrite dependencies by
Please file a PR on this problem, as I think there is definitely something
wrong with the aalib buildlink.mk files.
-- Johnny Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>