Subject: Re: Different sites for different distfiles, was Re: Packages with
To: Jared D. McNeill <>
From: Frederick Bruckman <>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 12/28/2001 09:50:00
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Jared D. McNeill wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Frederick Bruckman wrote:
> > We could just define MASTER_SITES_1, MASTER_SITES_2, MASTER_SITES_3, to
> > be matched with DISTFILES_1, DISTFILES_2, DISTFILES_3, respectively. I
> > doubt that we'd ever need more than three, and if a package ever did, it
> > would be easy to follow the pattern to add one (or two, or three).
> Why not just MASTER_SITES.${DISTFILE} ?

Yeah, that could work! We shouldn't check ${} for the
main distfile, just for the the supplemental DISTFILES and PATCH_FILES.