Subject: Re: autoconf
To: Alistair Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
Date: 12/20/2001 15:18:35
Alistair Crooks <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:52:45PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > > Backout upgrade of autoconf by popular demand.
> > So what's the long term result? We can't stay backreved forever?
> You overlooked the piece in my mail which said:
> > Now it should be possible to make a conflicting autoconf25 package,
> > but I'm a bit busy right now, for one thing.
No, I saw that. My question is what's the long term strategy for the
main autoconf package. Having a special purpose one around can't be
the permanent idea.
Perry E. Metzger email@example.com
NetBSD Development, Support & CDs. http://www.wasabisystems.com/