Subject: Question about make update
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Martin Weber <Ephaeton@gmx.net>
Date: 10/25/2001 11:55:28
Little question: What speaks against having make update
only run pkg_delete -r after a successful build ? At
the moment if you run make update, and run into a problem,
you end up with an error message and a deinstalled program,
if you, say, cvs updated during a bunch of commits or so.
Dunno, but I think this would be a bit more userfriendly ;)
Hmm, this would also make pkg_chk with the -u option a bit
more sane to use...
1984 is NOW