Subject: Re: bsd.python.mk ?!
To: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
Date: 05/17/2001 22:56:05
> bsd.perl.mk is already bad enough
What is bad about this? I'm not a perl expert, but it seems
to fulfill its purpose.
> that function could have been accomplished without the package hassle
> through better use of make(1) variable substitution
What's the "package hazzle", compared with "bsd.pkg.mk" blowup?
To be understood correctly, I don't have a really strong opinion
about a *-mk pkg vs. some Makefile.inc. I just want to find the