Subject: Re: bsd.python.mk ?!
To: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
List: tech-pkg
Date: 05/17/2001 22:56:05
tv@wasabisystems.com said:
> bsd.perl.mk is already bad enough

What is bad about this? I'm not a perl expert, but it seems
to fulfill its purpose.

> that function could have been accomplished without the package hassle
> through better use of make(1) variable substitution

What's the "package hazzle", compared with "bsd.pkg.mk" blowup?

To be understood correctly, I don't have a really strong opinion
about a *-mk pkg vs. some Makefile.inc. I just want to find the
best solution.

best regards
Matthias