Subject: Re: LOCALBASE and non NetBSD use of pkgsrc
To: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greywolf <email@example.com>
Date: 05/17/2001 08:49:51
On Thu, 17 May 2001, David Brownlee wrote:
# Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:27:14 +0100 (BST)
# From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
# To: Alistair Crooks <email@example.com>
# Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
# Subject: Re: LOCALBASE and non NetBSD use of pkgsrc
# On Thu, 17 May 2001, Alistair Crooks wrote:
# > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:23:59PM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
# > > I'd like to propose switching LOCALBASE on non NetBSD systems to
# > > /usr/pkg to match the NetBSD usage (rather than /usr/local) - at
# > > the very least on linux.
# > Yes. I really wish I'd made the Solaris LOCALBASE /usr/pkg now, but
# > 20:20 hindsight is a wonderful thing.
# OK - I've just defaulted the LOCALBASE to /usr/pkg for Linux.
# In order to reduce the chances of hosing any Solaris pkgsrc
# users I'd like to change the Solaris case to try to pick up
# an existing /usr/local based installation and refuse to run
# unless LOCALBASE is set explicitly.
You mean, if /usr/local exists then LOCALBASE must be set?
Or must it be set to something besides /usr/local, or...?
# The first idea cam up with would be to check for a directory
# in SunOS.pkg.dist (eg 'libexec/cgi-bin') - if it is present
# in /usr/local and not in /usr/pkg then give the warning and
I may be misunderstanding this, but FORCING it to live in /usr/pkg or
just die just seems really wrong to me, if that's what you're proposing.
I actually go out of my way to make sure that LOCALBASE *is* /usr/local
because I don't relish the idea of maintaining a fourth hierarchy,
not to mention I don't want to extend my path.
*BSD: More Nines.